Intake and qualification take too long
New inquiries sit in a shared inbox until someone has time to read them, ask clarifying questions, and route them to the right person.
Professional Services
Law firms, accounting practices, and consultancies run on billable time, yet intake, document prep, and status updates eat into it. We help you automate the repeatable parts of client work while keeping professional judgment where it belongs — with your team.
Where the Time Goes
New inquiries sit in a shared inbox until someone has time to read them, ask clarifying questions, and route them to the right person.
Drafting cover letters, engagement letters, or routine correspondence from templates consumes billable hours that could go to higher-value work.
Without a simple way to check progress, clients call or email your team directly, breaking concentration on deadline-driven work.
Prior client history, precedent documents, and firm knowledge live in scattered folders and email threads instead of somewhere the whole team can search.
Example Automations
These are examples of the kind of automation we build — the right fit for your business depends on your systems, volume, and workflow. Not a guarantee of results.
Example automation
New inquiries are summarized, checked against basic intake criteria, and routed to the right team member with the context already organized — a person still makes the engagement decision.
Example automation
Routine letters and standard documents get a first draft prepared from your templates and the details of the matter, so your team edits and finalizes instead of starting from a blank page.
Example automation
At agreed checkpoints, a draft status summary is prepared from matter or project notes for your team to review, adjust, and send — reducing ad hoc interruptions without removing the personal touch.
Example workflow
A prospective client submits an inquiry through your website contact form after hours.
Example workflow for illustration only — actual steps depend on your tools, policies, and how your team chooses to review automated work.
Before
No one reviews it until the next business day, and details are scattered across a long email.
A team member has to read the full message, decide if it fits the firm's practice areas, and figure out who should respond.
How quickly the inquiry gets a reply depends on who's available and how busy they are.
After (with review gate)
Key details — practice area, urgency, basic facts — are pulled out and organized as soon as the form is submitted.
The summary is routed to the appropriate attorney or team member along with the original message.
The team member reviews the summary, decides whether to engage, and sends a personal response — the system prepared the groundwork, not the decision.
Where People Stay in Control
We design these systems so your team decides what matters, and the automation handles the repetitive work around that decision.
AI tools prepare drafts and summaries only; every substantive opinion, filing, or client-facing recommendation is reviewed and issued by a licensed professional on your team.
Automations are scoped to the systems and data you approve, and any client-facing communication is reviewed before it goes out.
Intake automation organizes and routes inquiries — it does not accept clients, quote fees, or commit the firm to representation.
Protect Billable Time
We'll help you identify where intake, drafting, and status updates are pulling time away from client work, and design automation that keeps your team's judgment in the loop.